A miscellany of weekly ramblings on comics, art and film by Ted Mathot, storyboard artist and writer/artist/self-publisher of graphic novels and comics
______________________________________________

Monday, October 22, 2007

Composition, part 3

LINE, SPACE and GROUPING:

Some of you may remember the composition posts from Current Flavor. I found these images from The Royal Tenenbaums in a folder and thought it to be a good time for another post.

I'm fascinated by Wes Anderson's use of flat space in his films and his ablility to create dynamic and excitng compositions using flat space (at times combined with deep space) that engage the eye as well as direct the viewer's attention.

Here are a few examples of such shots. I've added arrows to indicate flat space elements and diagonal points of interest.

Generating Interest with LINE:

LINE is one of the building blocks of visual structure and can be broken down into horizontal (least intensity), vertical (more intensity) and diagonal (most intensity). Here are the examples:


Mostly flat space shot of Margot; notice how she generates the strongest diagonals in the shot (phone cord, angle of neck/head, leg), creating an area of interest for the viewer that contrasts with the flat space surrounding her. Those familiar with the rule of thirds will see she's placed right on a dividing line.



Same scene, but this time it's Ethel's posture that's creating the interest. She is engaging Margot at this point. Ethel is active, Margot is passive. The body language says it all here and again they are surrounded by flat space elements.

Generating interest with SPACE:


This is sort of anti-rule of thirds. In this scene there is confrontation between the three characters. They are all squashed into the middle third of the frame, cramping it and raising the intensity. All the characters are vertical lines (not that intense), so it's the deep space and the arrangement of the characters that create the intensity. I like the camera placement here too; it's just above the eyelines of the characters; just high enough to be interesting and to keep us with the characters. Any higher and the shot would start to lose intensity.



Deep space again. Note the perspecting heads leading the eye to Eli. They are all perfectly placed, and for all intents and purposes, TOO perfect. But that is part of the director's style and the shot is richer for it. his face is also at the vanishing point of the shot and all other perspecting lines lead right to it.


Grouping:

I like these shots for how elements are grouped together. The first one is especially interesting to me, with the choice to put the homeless guy up there in the right hand corner and the caution cone and sawhorses in the left corner with Margo and the car being a bridge between the two.

Could this shot work without those other elements? Sure. But it's those extra bits that add interest and texture.


These bottom two shots speak for themselves - showcases for the awesome and hilarious art on Eli's walls. Anderson knew this was going to get a huge laugh; the characters basically have no dialogue here other than "what?" "did you say something?" and "No, I thought you said something".




_____________________

13 comments:

J said...

Great post Ted!
Thanks for putting this.

Anonymous said...

Ted,

As I mentioned before, have you thought about going into teaching. You have an unique perspective in storytelling and break down the elements. You put your words into practice in R&I. It is quite remarkable and learning a lot as I am a novice and not in the film industry.

cK

craig said...

Great post Ted,
I find it interesting how many rules can be bent/broken in Wes' films. I recall a few scenes where he'll cut from a character center frame, to another character center frame about the same size and it works.

Monkeyfeather said...

Another great post Ted. Wes is SO good. As Craig said, he pushes the boundaries yet, it still works.

TSM said...

Thanks guys. I hope to get some examples from other directors up here soon.

Tools not rules!

benton jew said...

Great post! You obviously know your stuff! I'm looking forward to more!

Brandon said...

Really well thought out analysis. These are my favorite types of posts to run into whilst checking out the blogs.

Anderson's compositions sometimes remind me of Ozu, but with more of a sense of humor. I'd be interested to find out what types of lenses he used in each of your examples.

Ronan McDermott said...

Wow, Great post. Thanks for takin the time in posting this. I look forward to your future examples from other directors.

Louie del Carmen said...

One of my favorite shots from this movie is one in the intervention scene inside Eli's (Owen Wilson) apartment.

There is a stack of Porno VHS tapes in the extreme foreground with the titles just barely out of focus with Eli sitting in the BG.

The other amusing shot is one of the framed white underwear in the same sequence.

Really informative and another great post Ted.

Jamie Baker said...

Great Post. One of the many things that I admire about you, Ted, is your analytical skill. It shows through in your work as well.

spleenal said...

this is great. you never reallt think of that much thought going into a film.
or maybe that much thought never goes into watching one.
you know it looks good but you don't know why

Dave said...

Awesome post, Ted - thanks for sharing!

Adam said...

(I know I'm late to the party) Fascinating. It's not often you get to see movies broken down this way. Very good read.